Politics
Unpacking the ICC’s Charges Against Putin
The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in 2002, with the aim of prosecuting individuals responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. The ICC is a court of last resort, meaning that it only intervenes when national judicial systems are unable or unwilling to do so. Since its creation, the ICC has investigated and prosecuted cases in countries such as Sudan, Libya, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
However, the ICC’s jurisdiction remains controversial, with some countries refusing to recognize its authority. Russia, for example, is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC. Despite this, the ICC has recently announced its intention to investigate alleged war crimes committed by Russian President Vladimir Putin and other top officials.
The charges against Putin
The ICC’s charges against Putin relate to Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its ongoing involvement in the conflict in eastern Ukraine. The ICC alleges that Putin and other top officials are responsible for war crimes, including murder, torture, and enforced disappearances.
The ICC’s prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, stated that there was a “reasonable basis to believe” that crimes had been committed by Russian forces and their proxies in Ukraine. Bensouda also noted that the investigation would be conducted independently and impartially.
Accusations of war crimes in Ukraine
Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 was met with international condemnation, with many countries viewing it as a violation of international law. Since then, the conflict in eastern Ukraine has resulted in thousands of deaths and displacement of civilians.
The ICC’s charges against Putin and other officials relate to their alleged involvement in the conflict. The ICC alleges that Russian forces and their proxies committed war crimes, including murder, torture, and enforced disappearances. The ICC also alleges that Russian forces used prohibited weapons, such as cluster munitions, in civilian areas.
Russia has denied the allegations and has accused the ICC of being biased against it. The ICC’s investigation is ongoing, and it remains to be seen whether the court will be able to gather sufficient evidence to prosecute Putin and other officials.
The role of the ICC in international justice
The ICC’s charges against Putin highlight the role of the court in holding individuals accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. The ICC is unique in that it is the only permanent international court that has the power to prosecute individuals.
However, the ICC’s jurisdiction remains limited, given that not all countries are signatories to the Rome Statute. In addition, the ICC has faced criticism for its handling of cases and the length of time it takes to bring individuals to trial.
Despite these criticisms, the ICC remains an important institution in the fight against impunity for war crimes and other atrocities.
Criticisms of the ICC’s charges against Putin
The ICC’s charges against Putin have faced criticism from various quarters. Russia has accused the ICC of being biased against it and has questioned the court’s jurisdiction. Some legal experts have also questioned the ICC’s ability to prosecute individuals who are not signatories to the Rome Statute.
In addition, some have argued that the ICC’s charges against Putin are politically motivated. They argue that the ICC is being used as a tool by Western countries to put pressure on Russia and that the charges are unlikely to lead to an actual trial.
Potential outcomes of the ICC’s case against Putin
The ICC’s case against Putin is still ongoing, and it remains to be seen what the outcome will be. If the ICC is able to gather sufficient evidence, it may issue arrest warrants for Putin and other officials.
However, it is unlikely that Putin will ever be brought to trial, given that Russia does not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction. In addition, Russia has a history of ignoring international legal rulings, such as the International Court of Justice’s 2014 ruling that Russia must refrain from supporting separatist groups in eastern Ukraine.
The impact of the ICC’s charges on global politics
The ICC’s charges against Putin have significant implications for global politics. The charges are likely to further strain Russia’s relationship with the West and could lead to increased tensions between Russia and other countries.
In addition, the charges could have wider implications for international law and diplomacy. The case could set a precedent for the ICC’s jurisdiction over non-signatories to the Rome Statute, and it could also highlight the need for greater cooperation between countries to hold individuals accountable for war crimes and atrocities.
What the ICC’s charges against Putin mean for the future of international justice
The ICC’s charges against Putin are a significant development in the fight against impunity for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The charges highlight the need for greater international cooperation to hold individuals accountable for atrocities committed during conflicts.
However, the charges also raise questions about the ICC’s jurisdiction and its ability to prosecute individuals who are not signatories to the Rome Statute. The case against Putin is likely to be a long and complex one, with significant implications for global politics and international law.
Despite these challenges, the ICC remains an important institution in the fight against impunity for war crimes and other atrocities. The court’s work is crucial in ensuring that individuals responsible for these crimes are held accountable and that justice is served for their victims.
The results of an in-depth survey conducted by African Innovation Research SA (AIRSA) point to the country’s future being in the hands of coalitions and raise concerns about voter apathy, especially among the youth.
The initial sample comprised some 5 000 participants, of whom 46% confirmed they were either not interested in voting despite being registered or had not registered.
The majority of those surveyed by the independent research company based in Cape Town were in the 18–35 age group, a generation who are increasingly disillusioned with how the country is run.
The remaining 2 700 participants, who were interviewed from across a broad section of South Africa’s nine provinces, indicated that support for the ruling ANC is in decline, dipping below the 50% mark to 43% overall.
The ANC’s strongholds remain the Eastern Cape (61% of those surveyed), 58% in the Free State and 65% in Limpopo, where its challenger is the EFF at 23.7%.
In the country’s fourth-largest economy, Mpumalanga, the ANC leads with 52.3%, the EFF at 21.7% and the DA at 19.7%.
In the North West province, it’s a similar pattern, albeit reversed, with the ANC at 48.3%, the DA at 27.7% and the EFF at 20.0%, while in the Northern Cape, the ANC leads with 47.3%, followed by the DA with 24.3% and the EFF with 15.7%.
The country’s economic engine, Gauteng, is a key player in the power dynamics. Here, the ANC garnered 38.7%, but the EFF is growing its base to 19.3%, challenging the DA’s 20% of the province’s voters.
In the Western Cape, as expected, the DA holds onto a leading margin at 46.0%, with the ANC and EFF at 22.3% and 8.7% respectively. Gayton McKenzie’s Patriotic Alliance (PA) also features in the country’s southernmost province, making a notable showing at 5%.
While former president Jacob Zuma may have been barred from becoming a member of Parliament in the Constitutional Court this week, the new uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) will play a pivotal role in KwaZulu-Natal. Results of the AIRSA survey show that while the ANC currently remains ahead with 28.7%, it’s an even race in the province with similar support for the IFP at 26.0% and MKP at 26.7%.
As experience dictates, the smaller parties will begin a series of bargaining tactics as to whose deck they end up in and call the shots.
At collectively accounting for around 20% of the upcoming vote, these potential coalition partners carry significant influence.
AIRSA also noted that voting in this sector is personality-driven as opposed to ideology.
The fragmentation of South Africa’s political landscape could also contribute to increasing dissatisfaction and disillusionment, particularly when linked to the country’s youth and increasing unemployment.
© IOL (Cape Times)
Former President Jacob Zuma has launched a scathing attack on some of the country’s top judges after he was barred from running for parliament on Monday.
In his first interview since the ban, Zuma told the BBC the Constitutional Court was wrong to decide he was unfit to run, based on his 2021 conviction for contempt of court.
“I expected that from our judges, but they are definitely wrong. Not correct,” the 82-year-old said, adding that the constitution should be changed.
Ahead of next week’s general election, Zuma had been campaigning under the banner of the newly formed uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party.
He joined the party after falling out with the governing African National Congress (ANC), which he used to lead.
The electoral commission argued that the constitution bars anyone who was sentenced to more than 12 months in prison from serving as a lawmaker – a view backed by the Constitutional Court judges.
Zuma was convicted in 2021 for refusing to testify at an inquiry investigating corruption during his presidency.
His lawyers had insisted he was entitled to become an MP as his sentence was reduced to three months after current President Cyril Ramaphosa released him from prison in what was widely seen as an attempt to placate the former president’s angry supporters.
“The judges of the Constitutional Court have acted very funny to me – towards me in particular,” Zuma told the BBC.
“They are not taking into account the will of the people of this country, they use their own will.”
He was president from 2009 to 2018 before being forced out as leader of the ANC amid allegations of widespread corruption in his government.
The corruption, widely known as “State Capture”, saw hundreds of millions of rands of public assets taken into private hands. Zuma has always denied any direct role in corruption, but is due to face trial next year on allegations of bribery.
He told the BBC he had been wrongly stripped of his role as leader of the ANC.
“I don’t know what ‘State Capture’ means. If people say I am corrupt, what did I do? Do you have any facts about it? Am I guilty?
“I was removed before the end of my term, and nothing was produced as evidence that this was an issue.”
Zuma’s MK party had previously voiced its desire to change South Africa’s constitution, which was drawn up 30 years ago at the birth of the country’s democracy following decades of white-minority rule.
Asked about this in the light of his election ban, Zuma reiterated that the historic document needed to be changed.
“This constitution in the continent of Africa is guided by the laws from Europe, not us,” he said.
“There is nothing that has come right in this continent because we are still dominated by those who were the ones [who] slaved us, and after slavery, oppressed us, and after oppression, put their own laws to run us.
“There are details that clash with our lives.”
An Ipsos opinion poll released last month gave MK 8% of the vote, and the ANC 40% as it loses support to MK and other opposition parties.
But some analysts suggest that with the governing party stepping up its campaign in recent weeks, it could still cross the 50% mark. But if the ANC gets less than half of the vote, it would lose its majority for the first time in 30 years.
MK is expected to do especially well in Zuma’s home region of KwaZulu-Natal. Some opinion polls suggest it could emerge as the biggest party in KwaZulu-Natal, ending ANC dominance of the region.
After Zuma was jailed for contempt of court in 2021, angry supporters sparked days of deadly riots. More than 300 people were killed in the clashes.
On Wednesday Zuma said this violence demonstrated the scale of public support for him.
“This must tell you that the masses of this country loves Zuma – that’s why we had that,” he said.
When asked by the BBC if he would use this interview to call for peace and calm ahead of next week’s election, Zuma replied: “I’ve always done so.”
© BBC News
Iran’s supreme leader has presided over a funeral for the country’s late president, foreign minister and others killed in a helicopter crash on Sunday.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei led prayers at Tehran University, where caskets carrying the dead were draped in Iranian flags.
President Ebrahim Raisi died alongside Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian and six others in a helicopter crash near the border with Azerbaijan.
Authorities had warned against demonstrations against the funeral procession and insults posted online.
“Oh Allah, we didn’t see anything but good from him,” Ayatollah Khamenei said in the standard prayer for the dead in Arabic.
Iran’s acting president, Mohammad Mokhber, stood nearby and openly wept during the service.
People then carried the coffins out on their shoulders, with chants of “Death to America” heard outside.
They loaded them onto a trailer for a procession through downtown Tehran to Azadi Square, where Raisi gave speeches in the past.
In attendance were top leaders of Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, one of the country’s major power centres.
Also on hand was Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas, the militant group that Iran has armed and supported during the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.
Haniyeh is widely considered Hamas’s overall leader and has been a prominent member of the movement since 1980. The US Department of State designated him a terrorist in 2018.
“I come in the name of the Palestinian people, in the name of the resistance factions of Gaza…to express our condolences,” Haniyeh said.
He also described meeting Raisi in Tehran during Ramadan, the holy Muslim fasting month.
He said he heard the president say that “the Palestinian issue” remains the key one of the Muslim world, which “must fulfil their obligations to the Palestinians to liberate their land”.
He also claimed that Raisi called Hamas’ October 7 attack in Israel, which saw 1,200 people killed and 250 others taken hostage, an “earthquake in the heart of the Zionist entity”.
Also expected to attend services in Tehran were Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and a delegation from the Taliban of Afghanistan, which included their Foreign Minister Amir Khan Mutaqqi.
Iran’s theocracy declared five days of mourning over Sunday’s crash, encouraging people to attend the public mourning sessions.
Typically, government employees and schoolchildren attend such events en masse, while others take part out of patriotism, curiosity or to witness historic events.
For Iran’s Shiite theocracy, mass demonstrations have been crucial to demonstrating the legitimacy of their leadership since millions thronged the streets of Tehran to welcome Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979 during the Islamic Revolution, and also attended his funeral 10 years later.
An estimated one million turned out in 2020 for processions for the late Revolutionary Guard General Qasem Soleimani, who was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad.
Across the capital, large banners were raised hailing Raisi as “the martyr of service”, while others bade “farewell to the servant of the disadvantaged”.
Some residents in Tehran received texts urging them to attend Wednesday’s ceremonies, the AFP news agency reported.
Footage carried by state TV showed streets filled with mourners, many of whom were carrying pictures of Raisi or the Iranian flag.
Funeral rites for the men began on Tuesday in the city of Tabriz and the Shiite clerical centre of Qom, where thousands of mourners attended ceremonies.
After Wednesday’s procession in the capital, Raisi’s remains will be moved to South Khorasan province, before being transferred to his home city of Mashhad in the northeast.
He will then be buried on Thursday evening in the city after funeral rites at the Imam Reza shrine.
Raisi, a hardline cleric, was a highly divisive figure in Iran. In the 1980s, he oversaw the execution of scores of opposition activists while working as a prosecutor.
He unleashed a brutal crackdown against demonstrators angered by the killing of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in 2022. She died three days after she was detained by morality police in the capital for allegedly violating Iran’s strict rules requiring women to cover their hair with a hijab, or headscarf.
But his ultra-conservative outlook won favour with supporters of the regime, and Raisi was viewed as a possible successor to Ayatollah Khamenei.
© BBC News
Ireland will recognise a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Simon Harris said on Wednesday, adding that he expected other countries to follow in the coming weeks after talking to world leaders.
“Today, Ireland, Norway, and Spain are announcing that we recognise the state of Palestine,” Harris said at a press conference.
“In the lead up to today’s announcement, I’ve spoken with a number of other leaders and counterparts and I’m confident that further countries will join us in taking this important step in the coming weeks,” he added.
He said a two-state solution was the only credible path to peace and security for Israel, Palestine and their peoples.
The recognition of statehood has particular resonance in Ireland given its history, Harris said.
“Taking our place on the world stage and being recognised by others as having the right to be there was a matter of the highest importance for the founders of our state,” he said.
He added that Ireland was unequivocal in fully recognising Israel and its right to exist “securely and in peace with its neighbours”, and he called for all hostages in Gaza to be immediately returned.
Ireland’s recognition of Palestine will be formally enacted on May 28, foreign minister Micheal Martin said on X.
© Reuters
Legal Intelligence Firm redefines regulatory compliance with high-profile hire
New survey points to coalition-led SA, but voter apathy a major factor
Zuma lashes out at judges after election ban
DCS probes alleged criminal syndicate link in Thabo Bester’s escape scandal
Eagles centre Kelce retires after 13 seasons
You must be logged in to post a comment Login